Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMartin L. Culpepper.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, Jonathan B. (Jonathan Brigham)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-10T15:50:46Z
dc.date.available2008-01-10T15:50:46Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/1721.1/39879
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 391-393).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this thesis was to generate the knowledge required to represent the possible freedom topologies (motions of a mechanism) and the possible constraint topologies (flexural elements that guide the mechanism) in a form that designers can use to design parallel flexure systems. The framework that links these topologies enables designers to create three-dimensional, multi-axis flexure systems by using "Freedom and Constraint Topologies" (FACT). FACT embodies every possible design solution for parallel flexure systems. This information enables designers to consider every possible design and then select the design that is best suited for a specific application. FACT was created to improve the design processes for small-scale flexure systems and precision machines. For instance, there is a need to create multi-axis nanopositioners for emerging three-dimensional nano-scale research/manufacturing.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Through this work the following contributions were made: (1) twenty six unique matching pairs of freedom and constraint spaces were identified; (2) it was proven that these spaces embody all possible solutions; (3) a design process was created to guide a designer from design requirements, to freedom spaces, to constraint spaces, to mechanism designs; (4) a sub-process was created to guide designers in the selection of redundant constraints that help satisfy stiffness and symmetry requirements without altering the mechanism's kinematics; (5) mathematical expressions were created to represent the freedom and constraint spaces in a form that enables computers to identify and manipulate them. In this thesis, three case studies are provided to demonstrate the FACT design process for mechanisms of varying complexity: (1) a compliant spherical ball joint, (2) a compliant probe for a five axis STM, and (3) a compliant rotary flexure are designed. The second case study demonstrates the sub-process for selecting redundant constraints.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jonathan Brigham Hopkins.en_US
dc.format.extent393 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleDesign of parallel flexure systems via Freedom and Constraint Topologies (FACT)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc182522845en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record