Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPittinsky, Todd L.
dc.contributor.authorHadley, Constance Noonan
dc.contributor.authorSommer, S. Amy
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-22T18:47:28Z
dc.date.available2010-06-22T18:47:28Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/1721.1/55956
dc.description.abstractBased on literature and expert interviews, we developed the Crisis Leader Efficacy in Assessing and Deciding scale (C-LEAD) to capture the efficacy of leaders to assess information and make decisions in a public health and safety crisis. In Studies 1 and 2, we find that C-LEAD predicts decision-making difficulty and confidence in a crisis better than a measure of general leadership efficacy. In Study 3, C-LEAD predicts greater motivation to lead in a crisis, more crisis leader role-taking, and more accurate performance while in a crisis leader role. These findings support the scale’s construct validity and broaden our theoretical understanding of the nature of crisis leader efficacy.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCenter for Public Leadershipen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/en
dc.subjectcplen_US
dc.subjecthksen_US
dc.subjecthksen_US
dc.subjectleadershipen_US
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectcrisis leadershipen_US
dc.subjectpublic health and safetyen_US
dc.subjectinformation assessmenten_US
dc.titleMeasuring the Efficacy of Leaders to Assess Information and Make Decisions in a Crisis: The C-LEAD Scaleen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record